The question
My UK contract law question says a supplier delivered late and the buyer lost a profitable resale contract. I need to discuss breach and remedies.
I know damages are the main remedy, but I am not sure how to explain remoteness, mitigation and specific performance.
Short answer
A breach of contract remedies answer should identify the broken term, classify the breach, explain the available remedy and apply limits such as causation, remoteness, mitigation and proof of loss.
Full expert answer
Law tutor
LLM, solicitor (non-practising)
Breach of contract questions are not only about proving that something went wrong. A strong answer identifies the obligation breached, explains the consequence of that breach, and then analyses the remedy. In most undergraduate problem questions, damages are central, but the best answers also discuss limits on recovery.
This page is for academic legal writing only. It is not legal advice.
What the question is asking
The question is asking four linked things:
- 1What term or obligation was breached?
- 2Was the breach serious enough to justify termination, or only damages?
- 3What loss did the claimant suffer?
- 4Is that loss recoverable?
Do not jump straight from "there was a breach" to "the claimant gets money". You need causation, remoteness, mitigation and evidence of loss.
Mini problem example
Scenario: A supplier agrees to deliver specialist coffee machines by 1 May for a cafe launch. Delivery happens on 15 May. The cafe claims lost profits for two weeks and extra marketing costs.
A strong answer would:
- identify the delivery date as an express term
- explain that late delivery is a breach
- ask whether time was of the essence or whether the delay gives only damages
- calculate likely losses from the delayed opening
- consider whether lost profits were reasonably foreseeable
- ask whether the cafe mitigated loss, for example by hiring temporary machines
The answer should not assume every claimed loss is recoverable.
Sample university-style questions and how to answer them
| Sample question | What a strong answer should do |
|---|---|
| A supplier delivers machinery late and the buyer loses a resale contract. What damages are available? | Identify breach, causation, remoteness and whether the supplier knew about the resale contract. |
| A builder uses cheaper materials than specified. Can the customer terminate? | Discuss breach of an express term, seriousness of breach and whether damages are adequate. |
| A performer cancels a concert. Can the venue claim lost profits? | Discuss expectation damages, proof of loss, mitigation and foreseeable loss. |
| A seller refuses to complete a sale of unique goods. Is specific performance possible? | Explain that specific performance is discretionary and more likely where damages are inadequate. |
| A contract includes a fixed sum payable on breach. Is it enforceable? | Discuss whether it is a genuine commercial protection or an unenforceable penalty, depending on module coverage. |
Common mistakes
- Treating breach and remedy as the same issue
- Forgetting mitigation
- Assuming all consequential loss is recoverable
- Ignoring whether the claimant can prove the amount claimed
- Calling specific performance a normal remedy
- Failing to distinguish termination from damages
What earns higher marks
Use a remedy sequence:
- 1Loss caused by breach.
- 2Loss not too remote.
- 3Loss reasonably mitigated.
- 4Loss proven with evidence.
Then consider whether damages are adequate. If money can put the claimant in the expected position, damages are usually the primary remedy. If the subject matter is unique, equitable remedies may be worth discussing.
Academic use note
This content is for UK contract law education and assignment planning. It is not legal advice.
Sources and further reading
This answer explains a method for you to apply to your own work. Copying it into a submission would count as plagiarism, and it is indexed by similarity checkers.
All questions