Is quantitative easing inherently inflationary? An evaluation
A macroeconomics essay that sets out the transmission mechanisms, tests them against the post-2009 and post-2020 experience, and reaches a careful judgement.
- Paper type
- Essay
- Subject
- Economics
- Level
- Undergraduate
- Length
- 2,000 words
- Pages
- 7 pages
- Referencing
- APA 7
The brief
Evaluate the view that quantitative easing is inherently inflationary. Use economic theory and evidence from at least one advanced economy. 2,000 words, APA 7.
Why this sample works
What a marker would single out, and what to look for as you read.
- Transmission channels explained before any evidence is discussed
- Two episodes compared to show why outcomes differed
- Distinguishes asset price inflation from consumer price inflation
- A conclusion that rejects 'inherently' with reasons
Contents
- 01IntroductionIn preview
- 02How quantitative easing worksIn preview
- 03The quantity theory argument
- 04Evidence from 2009 to 2019
- 05Evidence from 2020 to 2023
- 06Evaluation and conclusion
Preview
Is quantitative easing inherently inflationary? An evaluation
Introduction
When the Bank of England began quantitative easing in 2009, critics warned that creating money on such a scale would inevitably lead to high inflation. For more than a decade, consumer price inflation instead remained close to or below target. When inflation did surge after 2021, the same argument returned. This essay evaluates whether quantitative easing is inherently inflationary and argues that it is not: its inflationary effect depends on the state of the economy and on what else is happening to demand and supply at the same time.
How quantitative easing works
Under quantitative easing, a central bank buys financial assets, mostly government bonds, paying with newly created reserves. Joyce et al. (2012) identify several channels through which this might affect the economy. Portfolio rebalancing raises asset prices and lowers long-term yields as sellers of bonds buy other assets. Signalling reinforces expectations that interest rates will stay low. A liquidity channel operates when markets are dysfunctional, as in 2009 and March 2020.
None of these channels increases spending in the economy directly. Each works by making borrowing cheaper or wealth larger, which only raises prices if households and firms respond by spending more than the economy can produce.
The rest of this sample is sent on request
Free, privately, usually within the hour. Kept off the web so it never turns up in a similarity check.
Request the full sampleReferences (extract, APA 7)
- Joyce, M., Miles, D., Scott, A., & Vayanos, D. (2012). Quantitative easing and unconventional monetary policy: An introduction. The Economic Journal, 122(564), F271–F288.
- Friedman, M. (1970). The counter-revolution in monetary theory. Institute of Economic Affairs.
- Bernanke, B. S. (2020). The new tools of monetary policy. American Economic Review, 110(4), 943–983.
Samples are reference material written for a different brief. Use them to understand structure and argument; submitting one, in whole or in part, would be an academic integrity breach.
All samples